Rotorua Trails Trust Group

Hey everyone, I've been messing around with different ways to bet on games lately, and something's been bugging me. You know how classic over/under feels pretty straightforward—you just pick if the total points go above or below that magic number the book sets? But then there's range-based stuff, where you're betting on the score landing inside a specific band or bracket. I swear it messes with my head more, like my brain starts thinking the probability is way higher for hitting that narrow window than it really is, especially when the range looks "safe" in the middle. Last weekend I threw a small place on an nba game range instead of the usual over, and even though it lost, I kept feeling like it was closer to cashing than a straight over would have. Anyone else notice that range bets twist your sense of odds differently, maybe make extremes feel less likely or something?